| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1344069330-29569-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 10:35:30 +0200
From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
To: Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c: fix usage of devm functions
From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Fix some problems with the use of devm_ functions.
devm_kzalloc: devm_kfree is not needed
devm_ioremap: iounmap should not be used, no free is needed
devm_request_irq: the devm_free_irq is followed by irq_dispose_mapping. I
don't know if it is safe to move the freeing of the irq in this case, so I
have just un-devm'd this function, since the implicit freeing is never
taken advantage of.
In the original code failure of of_address_to_resource jumped to free_mem,
but should have jumped to irq_dispose, since irq_of_parse_and_map has
completed at this point.
In the original code unmap_mem was after irq_dispose, but it should have
been before, again since irq_of_parse_and_map has completed at this point.
One of these problems was found using the following semantic match:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
@@
*x = devm_ioremap(...)
...
iounmap(x);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
---
Not compiled. Does free_irq actually have to be called before
irq_dispose_mapping?
drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c | 23 +++++++----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
index 434ad31..1af9e48 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
@@ -570,21 +570,19 @@ static int __devinit sirfsoc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
if (of_property_read_u32(dn, "cell-index", &id)) {
dev_err(dev, "Fail to get DMAC index\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
- goto free_mem;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
sdma->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dn, 0);
if (sdma->irq == NO_IRQ) {
dev_err(dev, "Error mapping IRQ!\n");
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto free_mem;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
ret = of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &res);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Error parsing memory region!\n");
- goto free_mem;
+ goto irq_dispose;
}
regs_start = res.start;
@@ -597,12 +595,11 @@ static int __devinit sirfsoc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
goto irq_dispose;
}
- ret = devm_request_irq(dev, sdma->irq, &sirfsoc_dma_irq, 0, DRV_NAME,
- sdma);
+ ret = request_irq(sdma->irq, &sirfsoc_dma_irq, 0, DRV_NAME, sdma);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Error requesting IRQ!\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
- goto unmap_mem;
+ goto irq_dispose;
}
dma = &sdma->dma;
@@ -652,13 +649,9 @@ static int __devinit sirfsoc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
return 0;
free_irq:
- devm_free_irq(dev, sdma->irq, sdma);
+ free_irq(sdma->irq, sdma);
irq_dispose:
irq_dispose_mapping(sdma->irq);
-unmap_mem:
- iounmap(sdma->base);
-free_mem:
- devm_kfree(dev, sdma);
return ret;
}
@@ -668,10 +661,8 @@ static int __devexit sirfsoc_dma_remove(struct platform_device *op)
struct sirfsoc_dma *sdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
dma_async_device_unregister(&sdma->dma);
- devm_free_irq(dev, sdma->irq, sdma);
+ free_irq(sdma->irq, sdma);
irq_dispose_mapping(sdma->irq);
- iounmap(sdma->base);
- devm_kfree(dev, sdma);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists