[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208052313.47024.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 23:13:46 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Only check for errors when calling dev_pm_get_subsys_data
On Sunday, August 05, 2012, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Commit 1d5fcfec22 (PM / Domains: Add device domain data reference counter)
> added a check for the return value of dev_pm_get_subsys_data.
>
> But this function does not only return error codes but also "1" when a
> new object has been created.
>
> So, change the check to only catch real errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Good catch!
Applied to the linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree. I'm going to
push it as a fix for v3.6.
However, there's one more analogous fix necessary, for which I'm going to
apply the appended patch.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: PM / Domains: Fix one more dev_pm_get_subsys_data() return value check
The check agains the return value of dev_pm_get_subsys_data()
in pm_genpd_add_callbacks() should be modified so that non-negative
values are not regarded as errors, because dev_pm_get_subsys_data()
returns 1 if it successfully creates a new object.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
---
drivers/base/power/domain.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/drivers/base/power/domain.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ linux/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -1691,7 +1691,7 @@ int pm_genpd_add_callbacks(struct device
device_pm_lock();
ret = dev_pm_get_subsys_data(dev);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret < 0)
goto out;
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists