linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] acpi-cpufreq: Move modern AMD cpufreq support to acpi-cpufreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201208052320.14712.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 5 Aug 2012 23:20:14 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] acpi-cpufreq: Move modern AMD cpufreq support to acpi-cpufreq

On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The programming model for cpufreq on current AMD CPUs is almost identical
> to the one used on Intel and VIA hardware. This patchset merges support
> into acpi-cpufreq and removes it from powernow-k8.
> 
> This patchset is heavily based on Matthew Garrett's V4 from last July.
> The boosting part has been mostly reworked and documentation for it
> has been added. Also there was a need for (yet another) BIOS quirk
> on AMD desktop boards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>

Peter, any objection to this series?

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/