| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 12:07:50 +0530
From: "Semwal, Sumit" <sumit.semwal@...com>
To: Rob Clark <rob.clark@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...aro.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de,
jesse.barker@...aro.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
t.stanislaws@...sung.com, maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com,
Rob Clark <rob@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: add helpers for attacher dma-parms
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Rob Clark <rob.clark@...aro.org> wrote:
> Fyi, Daniel Vetter had suggested on IRC that it would be cleaner to
> have a single helper fxn that most-restrictive union of all attached
> device's dma_parms. Really this should include dma_mask and
> coherent_dma_mask, I think. But that touches a lot of other places in
> the code. If no one objects to the cleanup of moving
> dma_mask/coherent_dma_mask into dma_parms, I'll do this first.
>
> So anyways, don't consider this patch yet for inclusion, I'll make an
> updated one based on dma_parms..
Hi Rob,
Any news on this patch-set?
>
> BR,
> -R
BR,
~Sumit.
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Rob Clark <rob.clark@...aro.org> wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark <rob@...com>
>>
>> Add some helpers to iterate through all attachers and get the most
>> restrictive segment size/count/boundary.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <rob@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 19 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> index 24e88fe..757ee20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> @@ -192,6 +192,69 @@ void dma_buf_put(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put);
>>
>> /**
>> + * dma_buf_max_seg_size - helper for exporters to get the minimum of
>> + * all attached device's max segment size
>> + */
>> +unsigned int dma_buf_max_seg_size(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> +{
>> + struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>> + unsigned int max = (unsigned int)-1;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dmabuf->lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(attach, &dmabuf->attachments, node)
>> + max = min(max, dma_get_max_seg_size(attach->dev));
>> + mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
>> +
>> + return max;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_max_seg_size);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dma_buf_max_seg_count - helper for exporters to get the minimum of
>> + * all attached device's max segment count
>> + */
>> +unsigned int dma_buf_max_seg_count(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> +{
>> + struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>> + unsigned int max = (unsigned int)-1;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dmabuf->lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(attach, &dmabuf->attachments, node)
>> + max = min(max, dma_get_max_seg_count(attach->dev));
>> + mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
>> +
>> + return max;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_max_seg_count);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dma_buf_get_seg_boundary - helper for exporters to get the most
>> + * restrictive segment alignment of all the attached devices
>> + */
>> +unsigned int dma_buf_get_seg_boundary(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> +{
>> + struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>> + unsigned int mask = (unsigned int)-1;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dmabuf->lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(attach, &dmabuf->attachments, node)
>> + mask &= dma_get_seg_boundary(attach->dev);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
>> +
>> + return mask;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_get_seg_boundary);
>> +
>> +/**
>> * dma_buf_attach - Add the device to dma_buf's attachments list; optionally,
>> * calls attach() of dma_buf_ops to allow device-specific attach functionality
>> * @dmabuf: [in] buffer to attach device to.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>> index eb48f38..9533b9b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>> @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ int dma_buf_fd(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, int flags);
>> struct dma_buf *dma_buf_get(int fd);
>> void dma_buf_put(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
>>
>> +unsigned int dma_buf_max_seg_size(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
>> +unsigned int dma_buf_max_seg_count(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
>> +unsigned int dma_buf_get_seg_boundary(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
>> +
>> struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *,
>> enum dma_data_direction);
>> void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *, struct sg_table *,
>> @@ -220,6 +224,21 @@ static inline void dma_buf_put(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline unsigned int dma_buf_max_seg_size(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int dma_buf_max_seg_count(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int dma_buf_get_seg_boundary(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(
>> struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, enum dma_data_direction write)
>> {
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists