linux-kernel - [RFC V3 PATCH 07/25] procfs: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1344244999-5081-8-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:23:01 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Laura Vasilescu <laura@...edu.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Subject: [RFC V3 PATCH 07/25] procfs: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY

N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.
N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory.

The code here need to handle with the nodes which have memory, we should
use N_MEMORY instead.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
---
 fs/proc/kcore.c    |    2 +-
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
index 86c67ee..e96d4f1 100644
--- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int kcore_update_ram(void)
 	/* Not inialized....update now */
 	/* find out "max pfn" */
 	end_pfn = 0;
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 		unsigned long node_end;
 		node_end  = NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn +
 			NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages;
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 4540b8f..ed3d381 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ static struct page *can_gather_numa_stats(pte_t pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		return NULL;
 
 	nid = page_to_nid(page);
-	if (!node_isset(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
+	if (!node_isset(nid, node_states[N_MEMORY]))
 		return NULL;
 
 	return page;
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ static int show_numa_map(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
 	if (md->writeback)
 		seq_printf(m, " writeback=%lu", md->writeback);
 
-	for_each_node_state(n, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
+	for_each_node_state(n, N_MEMORY)
 		if (md->node[n])
 			seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", n, md->node[n]);
 out:
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/