linux-kernel - Re: [patch v2] hugetlb: correct page offset index for sharing pmd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJd=RBCuvpG49JcTUY+qw-tTdH_vFLgOfJDE3sW97+M04TR+hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2012 21:37:45 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v2] hugetlb: correct page offset index for sharing pmd

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Sat 04-08-12 14:08:31, Hillf Danton wrote:
>> The computation of page offset index is incorrect to be used in scanning
>> prio tree, as huge page offset is required, and is fixed with well
>> defined routine.
>>
>> Changes from v1
>>       o s/linear_page_index/linear_hugepage_index/ for clearer code
>>       o hp_idx variable added for less change
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
>> ---
>>
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c       Fri Aug  3 20:34:58 2012
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c       Fri Aug  3 20:40:16 2012
>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static void huge_pmd_share(struct mm_str
>>  {
>>       struct vm_area_struct *vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
>>       struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
>> +     pgoff_t hp_idx;
>>       pgoff_t idx = ((addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>                       vma->vm_pgoff;
>
> So we have two indexes now. That is just plain ugly!
>

Two indexes result in less code change here and no change
in page_table_shareable. Plus linear_hugepage_index tells
clearly readers that hp_idx and idx are different.

Anyway I have no strong opinion to keep
page_table_shareable unchanged, but prefer less changes.

Thanks,
              Hillf

>>       struct prio_tree_iter iter;
>> @@ -72,8 +73,10 @@ static void huge_pmd_share(struct mm_str
>>       if (!vma_shareable(vma, addr))
>>               return;
>>
>> +     hp_idx = linear_hugepage_index(vma, addr);
>> +
>>       mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
>> -     vma_prio_tree_foreach(svma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, idx, idx) {
>> +     vma_prio_tree_foreach(svma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, hp_idx, hp_idx) {
>>               if (svma == vma)
>>                       continue;
>>
>> --
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/