linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: dove: DT support for Marvell Dove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2012 14:02:22 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rabeeh Khoury <rabeeh@...id-run.com>,
	Ian Molton <ian.molton@...ethink.co.uk>,
	Maen Suleiman <maen@...vell.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: dove: DT support for Marvell Dove

On Monday 06 August 2012, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> This patch set adds DT support for Marvell Dove SoC and three boards
> equipped with this SoC. The work is based on device tree support for
> Marvell Orion based SoCs introduced in 3.6-rc1.
> 
> The first three patches move mach-dove closer to Marvell Kirkwood's
> setup code by unifying the clock setup routines, adding clock gating
> control, and support for Marvell's crypto engine to mach-dove.
> 
> Patches 4 and 5 add a generic DT machine descriptor to mach-dove and
> corresponding DT descriptors for the SoC and already supported boards.
> 
> Finally, the last patch adds a DT descriptor for the SolidRun CuBox,
> a plug computer based on Marvell Dove.
> 
> This patch set relies on a DT support patch for sdhci-dove that has
> been sent to the corresponding maintainers a few days ago.

This looks vert nice!

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Has anyone tested it on cm-a510 and dove-db? Once we can reasonably
assume that there are no regressions compared to using the board
files, I think we can plan for removing the non-DT support in
mach-dove. If it's been tested positively, that can well be at
the same time as adding the DT support, otherwise I think we should
wait a couple of releases while having both simultaneously.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/