[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344262990.3441.13.camel@ul30vt.home>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:23:10 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix ACS path checking
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 14:20 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:50:10PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:08:46PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Hmm, tried it here, At least pci_request_acs() still gets called. How do
> > you detect if ACS is really enabled?
>
> Okay, I found a problem. pci_request_acs needs to be called before PCI
> probing. Does the attached patch help?
>
> From 87a4363be30d5d015a984a60769f29b0607fc5fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 14:18:42 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Fix pci_request_acs() call-place
>
> The pci_request_acs() function needs to be called before PCI
> probing to be effective. So move it to another call-place to
> ensure that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Yes, that's it. Before and after:
00:04.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RD890 PCI to PCI bridge (PCI express gpp port D) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Capabilities: [190] Access Control Services
ACSCap: SrcValid+ TransBlk+ ReqRedir+ CmpltRedir+ UpstreamFwd+ EgressCtrl- DirectTrans+
ACSCtl: SrcValid- TransBlk- ReqRedir- CmpltRedir- UpstreamFwd- EgressCtrl- DirectTrans-
Capabilities: [190] Access Control Services
ACSCap: SrcValid+ TransBlk+ ReqRedir+ CmpltRedir+ UpstreamFwd+ EgressCtrl- DirectTrans+
ACSCtl: SrcValid+ TransBlk- ReqRedir+ CmpltRedir+ UpstreamFwd+ EgressCtrl- DirectTrans-
The former makes iommu grouping put all my VFs in a single group below
this device. Correct given the ACS state, but not very useful. Thanks,
Alex
Tested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c
> index 500e7f1..0a2ea31 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c
> @@ -1131,9 +1131,6 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_init_pci(void)
> break;
> }
>
> - /* Make sure ACS will be enabled */
> - pci_request_acs();
> -
> ret = amd_iommu_init_devices();
>
> print_iommu_info();
> @@ -1652,6 +1649,9 @@ static bool detect_ivrs(void)
>
> early_acpi_os_unmap_memory((char __iomem *)ivrs_base, ivrs_size);
>
> + /* Make sure ACS will be enabled during PCI probe */
> + pci_request_acs();
> +
> return true;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists