[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501FDB45.4050104@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:57:09 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
jkosina@...e.cz, rob@...dley.net,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, spender@...ecurity.net,
keescook@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>, xemul@...allels.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org, #@...gramming.kicks-ass.net,
3.4.x@...gramming.kicks-ass.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "futex: Mark get_robust_list as deprecated"
Am 06.08.2012 16:53, schrieb Peter Zijlstra:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:29 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> get_robust_list has at least two valid use cases.
>> 1. checkpoint/restore in userspace
>> 2. post mortem analysis
>
> Shouldn't this then also be added as a comment somewhere near the
> implementation to avoid a repeat of this deprecate / undeprecate cycle?
Or someone submits a patch to glibc and the man-pages project to make this
system call official...
Thanks,
//richard
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists