lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120806145216.GE2487@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:52:16 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, team-fjord@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Changing date reference in CONFIG_SWIOTLB help from
 a relative to fixed point

On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 10:12:01PM -0700, Joe Millenbach wrote:
> CONFIG_SWIOTLB's existing help information refers to "the current
> generation of Intel's x86-64 CPUs", but the statement is no longer
> true.  After researching on Intel's ark site, I changed the statement
> to the also true "all Intel CPUs released before 2008".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 5bed94e..dadbfd6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -755,10 +755,10 @@ config SWIOTLB
>  	def_bool y if X86_64
>  	---help---
>  	  Support for software bounce buffers used on x86-64 systems
> -	  which don't have a hardware IOMMU (e.g. the current generation
> -	  of Intel's x86-64 CPUs). Using this PCI devices which can only
> -	  access 32-bits of memory can be used on systems with more than
> -	  3 GB of memory. If unsure, say Y.
> +	  which don't have a hardware IOMMU (e.g. all Intel CPUs released
> +	  before 2008). Using this PCI devices which can only access 32-bits
> +	  of memory can be used on systems with more than 3 GB of memory. If
> +	  unsure, say Y.

It actually should have that part about Intel CPUs removed - as the hardware
IOMMUs have nothing to do with the CPU. For example the SWIOTLB is used
on the AMD IOMMUs if the IOMMU does not cover certain devices.
So is the case with the IBM Calgary.

>  
>  config IOMMU_HELPER
>  	def_bool (CALGARY_IOMMU || GART_IOMMU || SWIOTLB || AMD_IOMMU)
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ