[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120806155446.GD29272@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:54:46 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
sameo@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mfd: Use interrupt-parent as IRQ controller if
specified in DT
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:46:40AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> - domain = irq_find_host(parent->of_node);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + parent_node = of_irq_find_parent(np);
> +#endif
Shouldn't of_irq_find_parent() be stubbed out by the header? Every
single user of this is going to need it. Indeed, shouldn't we be making
irq_find_host() just do this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists