[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANN689GqydNH0-gisSfUPtGKAHVajzZ4KQCTKoJ7J76dJ8zVbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 22:01:14 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Caused by commit 5599fe1ab023 ("rbtree: empty nodes have no color") from
> the akpm tree interacting with commit cde7c325077b ("GFS2: Add structure
> to contain rgrp, bitmap, offset tuple") from the gfs2 tree.
>
> I have applied the following merge fix patch (which is probably not
> sufficient).
You are right that this is insufficient - gfs2 is using
RB_EMPTY_NODE() to check for nodes not being inserted on any rbtree,
so it must use RB_CLEAR_NODE() for initialization.
Will attach a patch as a reply to this.
I am surprised how fast these rb_init_node() calls are spreading.
Should I send Linus a patch removing that function so he could include
it in v3.6 and avoid having to deal with all these new uses ?
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists