lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 08 Aug 2012 03:23:30 +0400
From:	Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@...linux.ru>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] ACPI: replace strlen("string") with sizeof("string")
 -1

07.08.2012 21:24, Alan Stern пишет:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
>
>> 06.08.2012 23:59, Alan Stern пишет:
>>> On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=41157;list=linux
>>>>>
>>>>> Interestingly, many (all?) of the changes in that patch are wrong
>>>>> because they don't try to match the terminating '\0'.  As a result,
>>>>> they will match against extensions of the target string as well as the
>>>>> target string itself.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> strNcmp compare N bytes - http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.5/lib/string.c#L270
>>>> memcmp compare N bytes  - http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.5/lib/string.c#L651
>>>
>>> Yes.  So if s contains "abcde" then
>>>
>>> 	memcmp(s, "abc", 3) and strncmp(s, "abc", 3) will both return 0, and
>>> 	memcmp(s, "abc", 4) and strncmp(s, "abc", 4) will both return 1.
>>
>> No matter what is contained in *s, "abcde" or "abcxxx",
>> are important first N bytes. The second example, you see,
>> a little bit stupid, and devoid of logic. :)
>
> Maybe yes, maybe no.  It all depends on what you want.
>
> For example, if you're looking for "on" or "off", what should you do
> when the user writes "onoff"?  You could accept it as meaning the same
> as "on", but if you were being careful then you would want to reject it
> as a meaningless value.


The users should't be allowed to think!
There is "on" - the size of 2 bytes, or "off" - 3 bytes,
other variations - user error.

We do not create a kernel with artificial intelligence? ;)

-- 
                                                          Pavel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists