[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344327742.2698.15.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:22:22 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, rpurdie@...ys.net, bryan.wu@...onical.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bergmann Arnd <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mfd: replace IORESOURCE_IO by IORESOURCE_MEM
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:31 +0100, Russell King wrote:
>
> So, if we made this a numeric index, then we have 32 resource types
> to deal with, and no need to bugger around with re-using an existing
> type for something else.
>
> This makes sense, MEM, IRQ and DMA are all mutually exclusive, as
> should be MEM and IO (because they can't coexist in two resource trees
> at the same time.) BUS only gets used in a hand-full of places and
> not with any other flags.
>
> So, looks like we can have 27 new resource types fairly easily.
Besides we can easily use a single IORESOURCE_OTHER for most things
really, if we prefer, make it IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM and have
platform device avoid that combo...
cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists