lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 07 Aug 2012 03:21:45 +0200
From:	Yann Cantin <yann.cantin@...oste.net>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC ebeam PATCH v3 1/2] hid: Blacklist new eBeam classic device

Le 07/08/2012 00:07, Dmitry Torokhov a écrit :
> On Monday, August 06, 2012 02:43:40 PM Greg KH wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:21:43PM +0200, Yann Cantin wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Yann Cantin <yann.cantin@...oste.net>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  drivers/hid/hid-core.c |    3 +++
>>>  drivers/hid/hid-ids.h  |    3 +++
>>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>>> index 60ea284..b1ed8ee 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>>> @@ -1908,6 +1908,9 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_ignore_list[]
>>> = {> 
>>>  	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_DELORME, USB_DEVICE_ID_DELORME_EM_LT20)
>>>  	},
>>>  	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_DREAM_CHEEKY, 0x0004) },
>>>  	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_DREAM_CHEEKY, 0x000a) },
>>>
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_INPUT_EBEAM_USB)
>>> +	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_EFI, USB_DEVICE_ID_EFI_CLASSIC) },
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Why is this #if in here?  Just always do it, how could it not be
>> defined?
> 
> User might disable the driver and CONFIG_INPUT_EBEAM_USB will not be
> set. But I agree, since the device is unusable with generic HID driver
> there is no point in doing this conditionally.

There's a closed-source user-space stack (libusb based daemon + xorg driver
+ wine apps) provided for some distro (Ubuntu 10.04, works on mandriva 2010,
maybe others but break on recent xorg).

I don't know exactly what to do : i don't want to break hypothetical support,
even proprietary.
Leaving the choice at kernel compile time seems to be safer, no ?

-- 
Yann Cantin
A4FEB47F
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ