[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24DF37198A1E704D9811D8F72B87EB51032C3B7E@NB-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:18:20 +0000
From: "Opensource [Anthony Olech]" <anthony.olech.opensource@...semi.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"Opensource [Anthony Olech]" <anthony.olech.opensource@...semi.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] regmap-irq: allow auto-allocated IRQs to be mapped
if you don't TOP POST how can you tell who wrote what?
see my comments embedded below
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com]
Sent: 04 August 2012 11:54
To: Opensource [Anthony Olech]
Cc: LKML; Anthony Olech; David Dajun Chen
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap-irq: allow auto-allocated IRQs to be mapped
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:05:15PM +0100, Anthony Olech wrote:
> if the irq_base is set to -1 when calling regmap_add_irq_chip() then
> allow the IRQ to be mapped even if the allocated irq_base is actually
> zero.
> This restores the behaviour seen in v3.4, and I assume that the
> tidy-ups just made in v3.5 INADVERTENTLY introduce this change in
> behaviour.
Please pay MORE attention to the changelog - obviously there's no problem mapping automatically allocated IRQs, there's only any effect if they happen to GET allocated at zero.
That is the problem - they are allocated at zero, and hence my patch
The only real issue I see with the current code is that if the user explicitly wants to statically allocate an IRQ range at zero they can't.
I don't want to explicitly allocate at zero.
The current intended behaviour is that we use a linear domain unless a positive IRQ base is specified, though we're not quite doing that right now as a transitional measure until drivers are updated.
The fact remains that my patch enables the DA9058 driver to work in v3.5
The current da9052 driver usage seems to have quite a few problems, I do recall having to fix some problems that make me doubt if it ever worked well. Looking at the code now I see it's using hard coded references to absolute IRQ numbers which is an issue... It should be being converted to use regmap_irq_get_virq().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists