linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] mfd: replace IORESOURCE_IO by IORESOURCE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAN1soZzSz9Gs_SsTd_5BOFNjUviZgBjBiGCjt1EsAtkS5XquQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:47:25 +0800
From:	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	rpurdie@...ys.net, bryan.wu@...onical.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bergmann Arnd <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mfd: replace IORESOURCE_IO by IORESOURCE_MEM

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:31:24PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>
>> Anyway, given that this thread is broken, there's no way for me to find
>> out what the _original_ issue is that you're talking about.  So I'm going
>> to guess that it's come up because we're out of IORESOURCE bits.
>
> No, that's not it.  What's happened is that Haojian has posted some
> patching changing all the _IO resources to _MEM in the Marvell PMIC
> drivers, I think because you yelled at him for using _IO when he
> reported that the changes in ioport_resource broke things a few releases
> ago.  Obviously this doesn't achieve a huge amount, it's a misplaced
> cleanup.
>
It's because IO_SPACE_LIMIT is set as 0 if there's no PCI devices. But
IORESOURCE_IO is also used in PMIC mfd drivers to distinguish
different components.

commit 04e1c83806e30ae339fc45def595960c7fef1697
Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed Jul 6 12:49:59 2011 +0100

    ARM: io: add a default IO_SPACE_LIMIT definition

    Add a default IO_SPACE_LIMIT definition.  Explain the chosen value and
    suggest why platforms would want to make it larger.

    Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>

>> So, if we made this a numeric index, then we have 32 resource types
>> to deal with, and no need to bugger around with re-using an existing
>> type for something else.
>
> This seems sensible, and I'm sure if that change were made people would
> be delighed to use new resource types, but like I say nobody who's
> motivated to do anything here seems to have the time to do anything
> about it.
>
> Whoever looks at this would need to do some detective work, it does seem
> like there must have been a reason to use a bitmask here...

Changing bitmask to a value for IORESOURCE type is a risk. I agree on Mark
that someone will complain on this.

Could we consider to expand the usage of IORESOURCE_IO? Maybe we can
use it for both ISA/PCI and IO related in chip.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/