[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120807020907.GB24289@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:09:09 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>
CC: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: imx: Don't use {en,dis}able_fiq() calls
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:39:50PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
> * make sure there's no weird FIQ stuff floating around that has so far
> relied on SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_FIQ doing select FIQ before I make it not
Acked on changing SND_IMX_SOC to SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_FIQ in
arch/arm/plat-mxc/Makefile.
> compile in for other boards (since otherwise no i.MX processor selects
> FIQ if they're not using that driver, it could be simply coincidence
> nobody noticed). I don't want to be the one submitting a patch I can't
> test which mysteriously breaks every MX28 on the planet (since Rob,
> Shawn, Sascha might be the ones swearing at me instead)
>
Though i.MX23 and i.MX28 are named in i.MX family, they are actually
a different architecture from IMX/MXC. It's MXS, nothing to do with
SSI. Folder sound/soc/mxs/ is the one for i.MX28.
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists