linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ptrace: fix set_task_blockstep()->update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50213462.5040304@linutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:29:38 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ptrace: fix set_task_blockstep()->update_debugctlmsr()
 logic

On 08/07/2012 05:15 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> It turns out, original code is even more buggy than I thought.
>
> Ironically, "task != current" case is more difficult and so far
> I do not see how we can handle this case correctly. I'll return
> to this a bit later, currently I am working on other patches.

maybe you could remove the autodectect mode and add helper for uprobe
which disables it.

>> For uprobes we never set the bit, we only need it cleared.
>
> Yes, at least at first step, and probably we will never need more.
>
>> We get here
>> via int 3 and do_debug() already clears TIF_BLOCKSTEP
>
> No, we get here via do_int3(), TIF_BLOCKSTEP is not cleared,

Yes, Sorry. my fault.

>> because the
>> CPU clears the bit in CPU.
>
> I am not sure. The manual says:
>
> 	 If the BTF flag is set when the processor generates a debug
> 	 exception, the processor clears the BTF flag along with the
> 	 TF flag.
>
> but I am not sure "debug exception" also means "breakpoint exception".
>
>
>
> do_debug() does clear TIF_BLOCKSTEP, and "The processor cleared BTF"
> is true in this case. But it is called after single-step.

I was wrong here in regard to do_debug() since do_int3() is correct.
Anyway, I checked it on real hardware and I saw the CPU in do_int3()
with BTF set after executing int3 with TF flag set and the BTF bit.

>
> Oleg.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/