[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1344355952-2382-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:12:27 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakaynahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
stan_shebs@...tor.com
Subject: uprobe: single step over uprobe & global breakpoints
We have three pieces here:
[PATCH 1/5] uprobes: Use a helper instead of ptrace's single step
[PATCH 2/5] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step
following Oleg's suggestion to allow single stepping over an uprobe.
[PATCH 3/5] uprobes: remove check for uprobe variable in
[PATCH 4/5] uprobes: probe definiton can only start with 'p' and '-'
category cleanup.
[RFC 5/5] uprobes: add global breakpoints
global breakpoints. There is no gdb interface available in terms of "how do I
know that that a program hit a global breakpoint" and not doing ps or
"cat trace" all the time.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists