[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120807171437.GC16861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:14:38 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Opensource [Anthony Olech]" <anthony.olech.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NEW DRIVER V1 5/7] DA9058 GPIO driver
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:15:17PM +0000, Opensource [Anthony Olech] wrote:
> I do realize that REGMAP does locking on individual register accesses,
> however, the each GPIO line is controlled by 4-bits in a register, with
> the meaning of the most significant bit depending on the GPIO direction,
> so it is essential that the register be read first before do an update, thus
> two sequential register accesses must be protected by a mutex to
> prevent another process changing the register (and hence the meaning
> of the most-significant bit) in the middle of the two accesses.
> I hope this explains to your satisfaction why a driver mutex is required
> in addition to the regmap's register access mutex
This seems a bit excessive and complicated - I'd be inclined to either
just say that the caller is responsible for avoiding confusion here
(obviously if you're changing the direction there's a race anyway) or
store the data in a variable locally rather than having to do I/O on the
device under lock every time it's interacted with.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists