[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120807173810.GE16877@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:38:10 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: mutex: hung tasks on SMP platforms with
asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:33:44PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> What I think is happening is that B writes the -1 in __mutex_lock_common
> and, after seeing a NULL owner (C may not have set that yet), drops through
> to the:
>
> if (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)
> goto done;
Sorry, should have proofread that. I meant to say:
What I think is happening is that B writes the -1 in __mutex_lock_common
after seeing a NULL owner (C may not have set that yet) and dropping through
to the:
if (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)
goto done;
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists