[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344361660.27383.4.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:47:40 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
"Petkov, Borislav" <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 19:28 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 07.08.12 09:24:21, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > Boris, Robert, Can you please send me the complete dmesg
> > and /proc/interrupts on a successful boot?
>
> Sent to you in private mail.
Thanks.
>
> What information are you looking for specifically? Maybe we can
> provide something here on the ml.
I was looking for what APIC mode and it was a PIC/IO-APIC interrupt.
So it looks like it is using logical flat mode and the interrupt was
from IO-APIC.
So most likely on your system after a successful boot, if you manually
set the affinity of one of those SATA/PATA interrupts to a specific
logical cpu say 0, I think the interrupt still get routed to other
logical cpu's. Can you confirm?
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists