[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208071946.52211.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:46:52 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
"v3.4+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mfd: max8925: Move _IO resources out of ioport_ioresource
On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> The removal of mach/io.h from most ARM platforms also set the range of
> valid IO ports to be empty for most platforms when previously any 32
> bit integer had been valid. This makes it impossible to add IO resources
> as the added range is smaller than that of the root resource for IO ports.
>
> Since we're not really using IO memory at all fix this by defining our
> own root resource outside the normal tree and make that the parent of
> all IO resources. This also ensures we won't conflict with read IO ports
> if we ever run on a platform which happens to use them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org (v3.4+)
(whole series)
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Thanks a lot for following through with this series! I would have
preferred to have the second step in stable as Russell suggested,
but since you did all the work, I'm not going to complain about it ;-)
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists