[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208080015.31359.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 00:15:31 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: coupled: fix sleeping while atomic in cpu notifier
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Colin Cross wrote:
> The cpu hotplug notifier gets called in both atomic and non-atomic
> contexts, it is not always safe to lock a mutex. Filter out all events
> except the six necessary ones, which are all sleepable, before taking
> the mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Has this been applied already?
Rafael
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c b/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> index 2c9bf26..c24dda0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> @@ -678,6 +678,18 @@ static int cpuidle_coupled_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
> struct cpuidle_device *dev;
>
> + switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
> + case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> + case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
> + case CPU_ONLINE:
> + case CPU_DEAD:
> + case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> + break;
> + default:
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> + }
> +
> mutex_lock(&cpuidle_lock);
>
> dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists