| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20120807222050.372800323@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:35:42 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, davej@...hat.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [ 083/109] sctp: Fix list corruption resulting from freeing an association on a list
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
[ Upstream commit 2eebc1e188e9e45886ee00662519849339884d6d ]
A few days ago Dave Jones reported this oops:
[22766.294255] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[22766.295376] CPU 0
[22766.295384] Modules linked in:
[22766.387137] ffffffffa169f292 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b ffff880147c03a90
ffff880147c03a74
[22766.387135] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000000000
[22766.387136] Process trinity-watchdo (pid: 10896, threadinfo ffff88013e7d2000,
[22766.387137] Stack:
[22766.387140] ffff880147c03a10
[22766.387140] ffffffffa169f2b6
[22766.387140] ffff88013ed95728
[22766.387143] 0000000000000002
[22766.387143] 0000000000000000
[22766.387143] ffff880003fad062
[22766.387144] ffff88013c120000
[22766.387144]
[22766.387145] Call Trace:
[22766.387145] <IRQ>
[22766.387150] [<ffffffffa169f292>] ? __sctp_lookup_association+0x62/0xd0
[sctp]
[22766.387154] [<ffffffffa169f2b6>] __sctp_lookup_association+0x86/0xd0 [sctp]
[22766.387157] [<ffffffffa169f597>] sctp_rcv+0x207/0xbb0 [sctp]
[22766.387161] [<ffffffff810d4da8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
[22766.387163] [<ffffffff815827e3>] ? nf_hook_slow+0x133/0x210
[22766.387166] [<ffffffff815902fc>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x4c/0x4c0
[22766.387168] [<ffffffff8159043d>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x18d/0x4c0
[22766.387169] [<ffffffff815902fc>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x4c/0x4c0
[22766.387171] [<ffffffff81590a07>] ip_local_deliver+0x47/0x80
[22766.387172] [<ffffffff8158fd80>] ip_rcv_finish+0x150/0x680
[22766.387174] [<ffffffff81590c54>] ip_rcv+0x214/0x320
[22766.387176] [<ffffffff81558c07>] __netif_receive_skb+0x7b7/0x910
[22766.387178] [<ffffffff8155856c>] ? __netif_receive_skb+0x11c/0x910
[22766.387180] [<ffffffff810d423e>] ? put_lock_stats.isra.25+0xe/0x40
[22766.387182] [<ffffffff81558f83>] netif_receive_skb+0x23/0x1f0
[22766.387183] [<ffffffff815596a9>] ? dev_gro_receive+0x139/0x440
[22766.387185] [<ffffffff81559280>] napi_skb_finish+0x70/0xa0
[22766.387187] [<ffffffff81559cb5>] napi_gro_receive+0xf5/0x130
[22766.387218] [<ffffffffa01c4679>] e1000_receive_skb+0x59/0x70 [e1000e]
[22766.387242] [<ffffffffa01c5aab>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x28b/0x460 [e1000e]
[22766.387266] [<ffffffffa01c9c18>] e1000e_poll+0x78/0x430 [e1000e]
[22766.387268] [<ffffffff81559fea>] net_rx_action+0x1aa/0x3d0
[22766.387270] [<ffffffff810a495f>] ? account_system_vtime+0x10f/0x130
[22766.387273] [<ffffffff810734d0>] __do_softirq+0xe0/0x420
[22766.387275] [<ffffffff8169826c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[22766.387278] [<ffffffff8101db15>] do_softirq+0xd5/0x110
[22766.387279] [<ffffffff81073bc5>] irq_exit+0xd5/0xe0
[22766.387281] [<ffffffff81698b03>] do_IRQ+0x63/0xd0
[22766.387283] [<ffffffff8168ee2f>] common_interrupt+0x6f/0x6f
[22766.387283] <EOI>
[22766.387284]
[22766.387285] [<ffffffff8168eed9>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b
[22766.387285] Code: c0 90 5d c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 4c 89 c8 5d c3 0f 1f 00 55 48
89 e5 48 83
ec 20 48 89 5d e8 4c 89 65 f0 4c 89 6d f8 66 66 66 66 90 <0f> b7 87 98 00 00 00
48 89 fb
49 89 f5 66 c1 c0 08 66 39 46 02
[22766.387307]
[22766.387307] RIP
[22766.387311] [<ffffffffa168a2c9>] sctp_assoc_is_match+0x19/0x90 [sctp]
[22766.387311] RSP <ffff880147c039b0>
[22766.387142] ffffffffa16ab120
[22766.599537] ---[ end trace 3f6dae82e37b17f5 ]---
[22766.601221] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
It appears from his analysis and some staring at the code that this is likely
occuring because an association is getting freed while still on the
sctp_assoc_hashtable. As a result, we get a gpf when traversing the hashtable
while a freed node corrupts part of the list.
Nominally I would think that an mibalanced refcount was responsible for this,
but I can't seem to find any obvious imbalance. What I did note however was
that the two places where we create an association using
sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE (__sctp_connect and sctp_sendmsg), have failure paths
which free a newly created association after calling sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE.
sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE brings us into the sctp_sf_do_prm_asoc path, which
issues a SCTP_CMD_NEW_ASOC side effect, which in turn adds a new association to
the aforementioned hash table. the sctp command interpreter that process side
effects has not way to unwind previously processed commands, so freeing the
association from the __sctp_connect or sctp_sendmsg error path would lead to a
freed association remaining on this hash table.
I've fixed this but modifying sctp_[un]hash_established to use hlist_del_init,
which allows us to proerly use hlist_unhashed to check if the node is on a
hashlist safely during a delete. That in turn alows us to safely call
sctp_unhash_established in the __sctp_connect and sctp_sendmsg error paths
before freeing them, regardles of what the associations state is on the hash
list.
I noted, while I was doing this, that the __sctp_unhash_endpoint was using
hlist_unhsashed in a simmilar fashion, but never nullified any removed nodes
pointers to make that function work properly, so I fixed that up in a simmilar
fashion.
I attempted to test this using a virtual guest running the SCTP_RR test from
netperf in a loop while running the trinity fuzzer, both in a loop. I wasn't
able to recreate the problem prior to this fix, nor was I able to trigger the
failure after (neither of which I suppose is suprising). Given the trace above
however, I think its likely that this is what we hit.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Reported-by: davej@...hat.com
CC: davej@...hat.com
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
CC: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
CC: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/sctp/input.c | 7 ++-----
net/sctp/socket.c | 12 ++++++++++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sctp/input.c
+++ b/net/sctp/input.c
@@ -736,15 +736,12 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_endpoint(struc
epb = &ep->base;
- if (hlist_unhashed(&epb->node))
- return;
-
epb->hashent = sctp_ep_hashfn(epb->bind_addr.port);
head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
- __hlist_del(&epb->node);
+ hlist_del_init(&epb->node);
sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
}
@@ -825,7 +822,7 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_established(st
head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
- __hlist_del(&epb->node);
+ hlist_del_init(&epb->node);
sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
}
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -1231,8 +1231,14 @@ out_free:
SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("About to exit __sctp_connect() free asoc: %p"
" kaddrs: %p err: %d\n",
asoc, kaddrs, err);
- if (asoc)
+ if (asoc) {
+ /* sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE may have added this association
+ * To the hash table, try to unhash it, just in case, its a noop
+ * if it wasn't hashed so we're safe
+ */
+ sctp_unhash_established(asoc);
sctp_association_free(asoc);
+ }
return err;
}
@@ -1942,8 +1948,10 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_sendmsg(struct kioc
goto out_unlock;
out_free:
- if (new_asoc)
+ if (new_asoc) {
+ sctp_unhash_established(asoc);
sctp_association_free(asoc);
+ }
out_unlock:
sctp_release_sock(sk);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists