[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANN689EcSPkawZMQC-L-odANez+T0mVg_w4v6iOLL5WHcKACfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:19:12 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: riel@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, vrajesh@...ch.edu,
daniel.santos@...ox.com, aarcange@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] rbtree: move augmented rbtree functionality to rbtree_augmented.h
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:
> Provide rb_insert_augmented() and rb_erase_augmented through
> a new rbtree_augmented.h include file. rb_erase_augmented() is defined
> there as an __always_inline function, in order to allow inlining of
> augmented rbtree callbacks into it. Since this generates a relatively
> large function, each augmented rbtree users should make sure to
> have a single call site.
I should probably add this to show how the code generation works out
in practice (with a gcc 4.6 based compiler)
Before this change:
text data bss dec hex filename
3426 0 0 3426 d62 lib/rbtree.o
0000000000000af0 g F .text 000000000000001e rb_last
0000000000000b80 g F .text 0000000000000047 rb_next
0000000000000000 g F .text 0000000000000165 rb_insert_color
0000000000000bd0 g F .text 0000000000000047 rb_prev
00000000000004e0 g F .text 00000000000001cd __rb_insert_augmented
0000000000000170 g F .text 000000000000036f rb_erase
00000000000006b0 g F .text 0000000000000416 rb_erase_augmented
0000000000000ad0 g F .text 000000000000001e rb_first
0000000000000b10 g F .text 000000000000006e rb_replace_node
text data bss dec hex filename
540 0 0 540 21c lib/interval_tree.o
0000000000000000 l F .text 0000000000000054
interval_tree_augment_propagate
0000000000000060 l F .text 000000000000000e interval_tree_augment_copy
0000000000000070 l F .text 000000000000003e
interval_tree_augment_rotate
00000000000000b0 g F .text 0000000000000065 interval_tree_insert
0000000000000120 g F .text 0000000000000012 interval_tree_remove
0000000000000140 g F .text 000000000000004c interval_tree_iter_first
0000000000000190 g F .text 0000000000000074 interval_tree_iter_next
After this change:
text data bss dec hex filename
2976 0 0 2976 ba0 lib/rbtree.o
0000000000000000 g F .text 000000000000025c __rb_erase_color
0000000000000930 g F .text 000000000000001e rb_last
00000000000009c0 g F .text 0000000000000047 rb_next
0000000000000260 g F .text 0000000000000165 rb_insert_color
0000000000000a10 g F .text 0000000000000047 rb_prev
0000000000000740 g F .text 00000000000001cd __rb_insert_augmented
00000000000003d0 g F .text 000000000000036f rb_erase
0000000000000910 g F .text 000000000000001e rb_first
0000000000000950 g F .text 000000000000006e rb_replace_node
text data bss dec hex filename
900 0 0 900 384 lib/interval_tree.o
0000000000000000 l F .text 000000000000003e
interval_tree_augment_rotate
0000000000000040 g F .text 0000000000000065 interval_tree_insert
00000000000000b0 g F .text 000000000000020b interval_tree_remove
00000000000002c0 g F .text 000000000000004c interval_tree_iter_first
0000000000000310 g F .text 0000000000000074 interval_tree_iter_next
So the code size effect is that the library code for augmented erase
shrinks by 450 bytes, and each augmented rb_erase user grows by (well,
this will very between users, but I think interval tree is
representative of a typical user) ~360 bytes. The rotate callback is
generated as a static function so it can be passed by pointer to the
library rebalancing routines; the copy and propagate functions are
inlined into interval_tree_remove (and the compiler is able to
determine that there are no remaining non-inlined calls, so it doesn't
generate an additional static definition).
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists