[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:14:01 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Open Source)" <cl@...ux.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@...com>
cc: JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
glommer@...allels.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, shuahkhan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug
cache integrity checks into a new function
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Shuah Khan wrote:
> No reason, just something I am used to doing :) inline is a good idea. I
> can fix that easily and send v2 patch.
Leave that to the compiler. There is no performance reason that would
give a benefit from forcing inline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists