linux-kernel - Re: [Regression] "x86-64/efi: Use EFI to deal with platform wall clock" prevents my machine from booting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1344502295.9195.7.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:51:35 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cJ-ko@...gloub.eu, "H. PeterAnvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Regression] "x86-64/efi: Use EFI to deal with platform wall
 clock" prevents my machine from booting

On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 11:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > 
> > I managed to find a machine to reproduce this on and it looks like the
> > ASUS firmware engineers are upto their old tricks of referencing
> > physical addresses after we've taken control of the memory map,
> 
> Yippie. On such systems we simply can't do any runtime calls.
> Should we add a command line option forcing efi_native to false,
> thus suppressing all runtime calls? Or would the "noefi" one be
> enough already?

I think a better solution for this, seeing as there appear to be *so*
many ASUS machines in the wild with this inability to do virtual EFI
calls, is to provide a 1:1 mapping as well as our regular virt->phys
mapping for the benefit of the firmware. We can load our special page
table in efi_call_*, etc.

One thing to note is that because of breakage seen on Apple machines
last time Matthew tried this approach, we (the kernel) can't actually
access the 1:1 mapping, it would exist purely for the benefit of
firmware that was broken enough to reference physical addresses after
SetVirtualAddressMap().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/