linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] regulator: Update comment for set_current_limit callback of struct regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120809104747.GK24328@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:47:47 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@...com>,
	"Milo(Woogyom) Kim" <milo.kim@...com>,
	David Dajun Chen <dchen@...semi.com>,
	Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] regulator: Update comment for set_current_limit
 callback of struct regulator_ops

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:17:18PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The regulators should be tending to the maximum in the available range and
> consumers should specify the widest range possible.

Applied all except 2 and 3.  Those are for actual current regulators
which are a bit odd here - I'm not really sure they should be in the
regulator API at all but their function is very different to the current
limits that are normally being specified.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/