[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5023C410.9030708@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:07:12 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jan.ariyasu@...com, jan.ariyasu@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
tgraf@...radead.org, xi.wang@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] sctp: network namespace support Part 2:
per net tunables
On 08/09/2012 02:20 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:02 -0700
>
>> Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
>> grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
>> tunable support on top of my last patchset.
>>
>> I have performed basic testing on the these patches and nothing
>> appears amis.
>>
>> The sm statemachine is a major tease as it has all of these association
>> and endpoint pointers in the common set of function parameters that turn
>> out to be NULL at the most inconvinient times. So I added to the common
>> parameter list a struct net pointer, that is never NULL.
>
> I like Eric's patch set and I'd like to apply it to net-next.
>
> Vlad?
>
I like these patches much more as well, but not done reviewing yet.
I'll try to finish the review tonight
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists