[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRpYdN3tFhik-9v7BQvr+wer2ocZuXGi0x0-pV+fA-mDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:59:09 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, john.johansen@...onical.com,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: tcp: security_sk_alloc() needed for unicast_sock
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 11:07 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
>
>> Is is possible to do the call to security_sk_alloc() in the ip_init() function
>> or does the per-cpu nature of the socket make this a pain?
>>
>
> Its a pain, if we want NUMA affinity.
>
> Here, each cpu should get memory from its closest node.
Okay, makes sense.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists