[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1208081950080.1306@eggly.anvils>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 20:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] proc: add /proc/pid/shmaps
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> >
> > > Add a shmaps entry to /proc/pid: show information about shared memory in an address space.
> > >
> > > People that use shared memory and want to perform an analyzing about it. For example, judge whether any memory address is shared. This file just contains 'share' part of /proc/pid/maps now. There are too many contents in maps, and so we have to do a lot of analysis to obtain relative information every time.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
> >
> > Nack as unnecessary; /proc/pid/maps already explicitly emits 's' for VM_MAYSHARE and 'p' otherwise so this information is already available to userspace.
> >
>
> Thanks for your reply. There are so many contents in /proc/pid/maps, and usually only a very small minority of those are about shared memory in address space of every process. So I hope that a new file maybe provide some convenience. Could you tell me how to get such information except analyzing 'maps' file?
You are joking? Please imagine what the kernel and /proc would look like
if it provided a personally tailored /proc file to everybody who could not
be bothered to parse the information already shown there.
Sure, there is already lots of ugly and duplicative junk under /proc,
which usually has to be kept to preserve back compatibility; but please
do not try to add to it.
There is sometimes an excuse if some fields of an existing /proc file are
significantly more expensive for the kernel to compute than others: then
a file which separates them can save processing. But that is definitely
not the case here.
A side issue would be whether parsing /proc/pid/maps for 's' VM_MAYSHARE
mappings (or your equivalent patch) actually tells you what you want to
know about "shared memory" - that would depend on what you really want
to know, and what you mean by shared memory.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists