linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] perf: sharing of cpuctx between core and ibs PMU causes problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBRzyrmL_yiKnYWU4qaSZXbD=JJVnm5py4PUcgAYvT=hcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Aug 2012 21:21:32 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: sharing of cpuctx between core and ibs PMU causes problems

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 16:05 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> > uncore PMU does not have this issue because uncore_pmu->task_ctx_nr
>> > is 'perf_invalid_context'. find_pmu_context() always return NULL in
>> > that case.
>> >
>> Yes, I think IBS should do the same and that should fix the problem
>> there too. Will try that.
>
> I'm afraid not, per-task profiling with uncore doesn't really make that
> much sense. For IBS it does.
>
> We can't share a context with different PMUs, that'll totally mess up
> the event scheduling.
>
> We'll have to grow perf_event_task_context with an extra context and
> have IBS use that.

Ok, I am fine with that. Don't know about to call it though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/