[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO_48GF+5tV_24R1NeqRDLh1S3+LQUFDN9B4cAg1HJrP5ZGcRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:02:08 +0530
From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
To: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Rob Clark <rob@...com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: add reference counting for exporter module
Hi Tomasz,
On 8 August 2012 19:36, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:53:10PM +0200, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>>
>> On 08/08/2012 03:35 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > Hi Tomasz,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for the patch; may I ask you to split it into 2 patches (1
dma-buf and 1 drm) and submit? That ways, either Dave or I can take
the patches for either pull request.
With that, please feel free to add my Acked-by as well.
>> >
>> > On Wednesday 08 August 2012 12:17:41 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> >> This patch adds reference counting on a module that exports dma-buf and
>> >> implements its operations. This prevents the module from being unloaded
>> >> while DMABUF file is in use.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt | 3 ++-
>> >> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 1 +
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 1 +
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c | 1 +
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_prime.c | 1 +
>> >> drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c | 1 +
>> >> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 2 ++
>> >> 8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >> @@ -96,6 +98,7 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(void *priv, const struct
>> >> dma_buf_ops *ops, struct file *file;
>> >>
>> >> if (WARN_ON(!priv || !ops
>> >> + || !ops->owner
>>
>> Thank you for spotting this.
>> I didn'y know that try_get_module returned true is module was NULL.
>>
>> BTW. Is it worth to add ".owner = THIS_MODULE," to all dma_buf
>> exporters in this patch?
>
> Yeah, I think that makes sense. Otherwise it might get lost somewhere,
> i.e. you can smash my Ack on this.
> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Mail: daniel@...ll.ch
> Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
Thanks and regards,
Sumit Semwal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists