linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] block: Kill bi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120809060517.GB2845@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Aug 2012 23:05:17 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com,
	neilb@...e.de, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
	mpatocka@...hat.com, sage@...dream.net, yehuda@...newdream.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] block: Kill bi_destructor

Hello,

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:21:54PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > What's wrong with good ol' NULL?
> 
> If it's NULL, we can't distinguish between bios where that field wasn't
> set (i.e. bios that were statically allocated somewhere) from bios that
> were allocated by bio_kmalloc().
> 
> It's just there to make debugging easier - if bi_cnt goes to 0 on a bio
> where it shouldn't we'll catch it at the BUG_ON() in bio_free() instead
> of kfreeing a bad pointer.

I fail to see how that improves anything.  slab will complain clearly
if it gets passed in a pointer to static area.  The benefit is
imaginery.  If there's no bioset, it's NULL.  Let's please keep things
usual.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/