[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344595650.3975.13.camel@thorin>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:47:28 +0200
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
To: "devendra.aaru" <devendra.aaru@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re:
Hi!
On Fre, 2012-08-10 at 11:02 +0530, devendra.aaru wrote:
[...]
> In function tegra_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map the num_maps the num_maps
> counter must be incremented for each child node?
>
> Actually we are doing free until num_maps if tegra_pinctrl_dt_subnode_to_map,
>
> not only that if num_maps == 0, we wont free up the maps, and also i
> think the for_each_of_node checks whether we have a next child node,
> so its safe to do num_maps++ as it wont get incremented endlessly,
[...]
Not that I looked into the source but ....
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.c
> index ae52e4e..33ae918 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ int tegra_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct
> pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
... num_maps appears to be a pointer to the counter here and ...
> *num_maps = 0;
>
> for_each_child_of_node(np_config, np) {
... here you increment the pointer as such and where it points to (which
appears to be the counter).
> + num_maps++;
> ret = tegra_pinctrl_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev->dev, np, map,
> &reserved_maps, num_maps);
> if (ret < 0) {
Kinf regards,
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at
LUGA : http://www.luga.at
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists