[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBDu5ebAAOuie5yNc8x7vkn7LPfDZZyGzRsCUFNRojWmwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:00:28 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mmap: feed back correct prev vma when finding vma
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Hillf Danton wrote:
>> After walking rb tree, if vma is determined, prev vma has to be determined
>> based on vma; and rb_prev should be considered only if no vma determined.
>
> Why? Because you think more code is better code? I disagree.
s/more/correct/
Because feedback is incorrect if we return vma corresponding to
the root node.
Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists