[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50254F69.2000409@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:14:01 -0500
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] promote zcache from staging
On 08/09/2012 03:20 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote
> I also wonder if you have anything else unusual in your
> test setup, such as a fast swap disk (mine is a partition
> on the same rotating disk as source and target of the kernel build,
> the default install for a RHEL6 system)?
I'm using a normal SATA HDD with two partitions, one for
swap and the other an ext3 filesystem with the kernel source.
> Or have you disabled cleancache?
Yes, I _did_ disable cleancache. I could see where having
cleancache enabled could explain the difference in results.
> Or have you changed any sysfs parameters or
> other kernel files?
No.
> And are you using 512M of physical memory or relying on
> kernel boot parameters to reduce visible memory
Limited with mem=512M boot parameter.
> ... and
> if the latter have you confirmed with /proc/meminfo?
Yes, confirmed.
Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists