[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50255393.7070400@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:31:47 +0200
From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...il.com>
To: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry
On 08/10/2012 04:05 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index b4c3582..2b822ac 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -1963,6 +1963,9 @@ struct proto udp_prot = {
> .compat_getsockopt = compat_udp_getsockopt,
> #endif
> .clear_sk = sk_prot_clear_portaddr_nulls,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> + .has_own_proc_entry= 1,
> +#endif
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(udp_prot);
>
>
Two points:
- I haven't seen patch 01/15;
- these patches should go to netdev rather than lkml
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists