[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2a9y2cpj7.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:09:48 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nhoriguc@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] HWPOISON: undo memory error handling for dirty pagecache
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> writes:
> Current memory error handling on dirty pagecache has a bug that user
> processes who use corrupted pages via read() or write() can't be aware
> of the memory error and result in discarding dirty data silently.
>
> The following patch is to improve handling/reporting memory errors on
> this case, but as a short term solution I suggest that we should undo
> the present error handling code and just leave errors for such cases
> (which expect the 2nd MCE to panic the system) to ensure data consistency.
Not sure that's the right approach. It's not worse than any other IO
errors isn't it?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists