[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344568144.6935.97.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:09:04 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracepoints: Move the work out of line from
hotpath sections
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 22:05 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> In your example, is the attribute attached to the if() or the following
> basic block ? Attaching it to the basic block allows a nice level of
> genericity:
Yes, I meant the block, not the if().
Heck, any block could be done this way, even just a block insertion...
void foo(int bar) {
[...]
__attribute__((section("mysection")) {
/* code here is in 'mysection' */
}
[...]
}
All gcc would have to do is place a hard jump to the code in the
section, and have the section jump back.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists