[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344690873.2003.1.camel@leonhard>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:14:33 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Matt Hellsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
David Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] perf symbol: correct comment wrt kallsyms loading
2012-08-10 (금), 15:22 -0700, Cody P Schafer:
> In kallsyms_parse() when calling process_symbol() (a callback argument
> to kallsyms_parse()), we pass start as both start & end (ie:
> start=start, end=start).
>
> In map__process_kallsym_symbol(), the length is calculated as 'end - start + 1',
> making the length 1, not 0.
>
> Essentially, start & end define an inclusive range.
>
This seems not needed any more due to the patch #2, right?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> index f02de8a..891f83c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ int kallsyms__parse(const char *filename, void *arg,
>
> /*
> * module symbols are not sorted so we add all
> - * symbols with zero length and rely on
> + * symbols, setting length to 1, and rely on
> * symbols__fixup_end() to fix it up.
> */
> err = process_symbol(arg, symbol_name,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists