linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:34:22 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>, amwang@...hat.com,
	dyoung@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl,
	yinghai.lu@...cle.com, tiwai@...e.de, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"

On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>>
>> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might
>> be a better solution.
>>
>> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that
>> are being mapped
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540
>>
> Actually, apply that series of 5 patches.
>

I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip.

However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying 
the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that.  On the other 
hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/