| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5026A5AE.6050608@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:34:22 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>, amwang@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl, yinghai.lu@...cle.com, tiwai@...e.de, kexec@...ts.infradead.org CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression" On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: >> >> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might >> be a better solution. >> >> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that >> are being mapped >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540 >> > Actually, apply that series of 5 patches. > I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip. However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that. On the other hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists