[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F19375F30@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:54:09 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC: "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [BUGFIX PATCH][RESEND] kexec & iosapic: kexec oops when iosapic
was removed
> vec = irq_to_vector(irq);
> list_for_each_entry(rte, &info->rtes,
> rte_list) {
> + if (rte->refcnt == NO_REF_RTE)
> + continue;
> +
> iosapic_write(rte->iosapic,
> IOSAPIC_RTE_LOW(rte->rte_index),
> IOSAPIC_MASK|vec);
This will work - but is it papering over a problem when you removed the
iosapic? Should we really have removed this "rte" from rte_list when the
iosapic was removed?
-Tony
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists