linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] drivers: hv: use Linux version in guest ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <426367E2313C2449837CD2DE46E7EAF9236BF42E@SN2PRD0310MB382.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:04:35 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drivers: hv: use Linux version in guest ID



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjørn Mork [mailto:bjorn@...k.no]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:00 AM
> To: Greg KH
> Cc: KY Srinivasan; Paolo Bonzini; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: hv: use Linux version in guest ID
> 
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:02:44PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:08AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +/* Linux vendor ID allocated by Microsoft */
> >> > > +#define HV_LINUX_GUEST_ID_VENDOR	0xB16B
> >> > > +
> >> > > +/* Creating a guest ID conforming to the encoding recommended by
> >> > > + * Microsoft, with variant and build fixed to 0
> >> >
> >> > We could use the kernel build number here as well, if we really wanted
> >> > it, right?
> 
> Yes, we could.  I just didn't see any value it that. Why would you want
> your hypervisor to care about some arbitrary build number?
> 
> But it can of course be added if anyone needs it.
> 
> >> > Otherwise, I like this patch, KY, any objection to me taking it?
> >>
> >> Greg,
> >>
> >> If it is ok with you can we wait a couple of days. I am pushing to get
> information
> >> back from folks within MSFT. I am hoping  we can fix this issue soon.
> >
> > Ok, I'll hold on to it for a week or so.
> 
> Not to nag or anything like that, but ... It's been a week or so now,
> hasn't it? :-)

In the interim, I have submitted a patch that conforms to the MSFT guidelines
for generating guest IDs for non-MSFT operating systems on Hyper-V.

Regards,

K. Y