lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120813163601.GC9180@google.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:36:01 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> To speed cpu down processing up, use system_highpri_wq.
> As scheduling priority of workers on it is higher than system_wq and
> it is not contended by other normal works on this cpu, work on it
> is processed faster than system_wq.

Is this from an actual workload?  ie. do you have a test case where
this matters?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ