lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4MW_O1LRqJ41zQ47sXAjAyi6U=9LPB=Vbrtj+WhtSU2LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:02:31 +0900
From:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work

2012/8/14 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> To speed cpu down processing up, use system_highpri_wq.
>> As scheduling priority of workers on it is higher than system_wq and
>> it is not contended by other normal works on this cpu, work on it
>> is processed faster than system_wq.
>
> Is this from an actual workload?  ie. do you have a test case where
> this matters?

No. it is not from an actual workload.
I got this idea suddenly, during implementing others.
I will do a test for this tomorrow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ