[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-edde96eafc91a510f404e7b82cfc0ecb608505ee@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:05:27 -0700
From: tip-bot for Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, penberg@...nel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Document schedule() entry points
Commit-ID: edde96eafc91a510f404e7b82cfc0ecb608505ee
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/edde96eafc91a510f404e7b82cfc0ecb608505ee
Author: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:49:47 +0300
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:58:15 +0200
sched: Document schedule() entry points
This patch adds a comment on top of the schedule() function to explain
to scheduler newbies how the main scheduler function is entered.
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Explained-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Explained-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344070187-2420-1-git-send-email-penberg@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index fbf1fd0..c9a3655 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3367,6 +3367,40 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq)
/*
* __schedule() is the main scheduler function.
+ *
+ * The main means of driving the scheduler and thus entering this function are:
+ *
+ * 1. Explicit blocking: mutex, semaphore, waitqueue, etc.
+ *
+ * 2. TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag is checked on interrupt and userspace return
+ * paths. For example, see arch/x86/entry_64.S.
+ *
+ * To drive preemption between tasks, the scheduler sets the flag in timer
+ * interrupt handler scheduler_tick().
+ *
+ * 3. Wakeups don't really cause entry into schedule(). They add a
+ * task to the run-queue and that's it.
+ *
+ * Now, if the new task added to the run-queue preempts the current
+ * task, then the wakeup sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED and schedule() gets
+ * called on the nearest possible occasion:
+ *
+ * - If the kernel is preemptible (CONFIG_PREEMPT=y):
+ *
+ * - in syscall or exception context, at the next outmost
+ * preempt_enable(). (this might be as soon as the wake_up()'s
+ * spin_unlock()!)
+ *
+ * - in IRQ context, return from interrupt-handler to
+ * preemptible context
+ *
+ * - If the kernel is not preemptible (CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set)
+ * then at the next:
+ *
+ * - cond_resched() call
+ * - explicit schedule() call
+ * - return from syscall or exception to user-space
+ * - return from interrupt-handler to user-space
*/
static void __sched __schedule(void)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists