[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120813170745.GH9180@google.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:07:45 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> 2012/8/14 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Is this from an actual workload? ie. do you have a test case where
> > this matters?
>
> No. it is not from an actual workload.
> I got this idea suddenly, during implementing others.
> I will do a test for this tomorrow.
I don't think it's a bad idea and guess this wouldn't make much
difference under most workload. Was mostly wondering whether this
came from some crazy phone powersave optimization.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists